In a recent ruling, an Arizona appeals court upheld a decision to dismiss a woman’s malpractice claim against her ex-attorney. The court concluded she suffered no direct financial loss from the attorney’s missed deadline, despite a $200,000 error in the divorce decree regarding familial debt. It was established that the obligation to pay the debt remained unchanged and fully enforceable.
In a contentious case involving allegations of forgery against Malachite Venture Corporation, the Texas First…
For the 2025-26 Swachh Survekshan Awards, Navi Mumbai has claimed the esteemed title of the…
The Supreme Court collegium is working to establish a systematic policy for transferring judges among…
In a landmark decision, the Supreme Court declared that divorces executed overseas, based on grounds…
Nathaniel Christopher has a lovely recap of his time at WordCamp Canada. Very cool that…