Blog

Sabarimala case: ‘Judges experts in law, not religion,’ Centre tells SC over ‘superstition’

The Supreme Court asserted its authority to determine if a religious practice constitutes superstition, clashing with the Centre’s argument that secular courts are not equipped for such judgments. Justices questioned the limits of judicial intervention, emphasizing the need to assess practices against constitutional safeguards and a faith’s own philosophy.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *